Where have the wideouts gone Explaining the recent bust rate for first-round WRs

Wiki Article

Safe picks in the NFL Draft do not exist, as much as pre-draft lexicon might lead you to believe it. For a nice stretch over the last decade, however, selecting a wideout in the first round was a pretty profitable enterprise. Lately, those profits appear to have vanished, with first-round wideouts struggling to make an impact for their respective teams.But is it actually an adjustment i sue? Or was the position always difficult to acclimate in the first place? We may have been fooled by an impre sive stretch of wide receivers who entered the league.It began in 2011, an all-time draft cla s, with A.J. Green (fourth) and (sixth) both going in the top 10. Each player made an immediate impact on their respective team: Green's first year below 1,000 yards receiving with the came in 2016, while Jones has averaged 1,293 yards per season over his seven-year career. Average it out to a per-16 game basis and Jones tops 1,500 yards in an average season; only injury has held him back. Things culminated in 2014, when we saw five wideouts go in the first 32 picks -- , , , and -- who would help to create one of the most succe sful rookie wide receiver groups in NFL history. We can get to the nitpicks on how much those guys impact the landscape in a second, but the worst performer from that group was Cooks, who caught 53 pa ses for 550 yards and three touchdowns in his rookie season. ReceiverPick in 2014 NFL Draft (Team)Receptions (2014)Receiving yards (2014)Receiving TDs (2014)Sammy Watkins4th overall (BUF)659826Mike Evans7th overall (TB)681, Evander Kane Men Jersey 05112 Jr.12th overall (NYG)911,30512Brandin Cooks20th overall (NOR)535503Kelvin Benjamin28th overall (CAR)731,0089This was entirely unprecedented. Before the 2011 NFL Draft there were 10 receivers with 1,000 yards receiving in their rookie season. The only three since Randy Mo s exploded on the scene in 1998 were Anquan Boldin (2003, a dominant force who surprised everyone), Michael Clayton (2004, a first-round flash in the pan) and (2006, from the sixth round, you're lying if you saw it coming).Five years pa sed before Green did it in 2011. would follow up on the feat in 2013, but there were still just 12 of these seasons before the 2014 NFL Draft. It was highly unlikely you would see three different receivers in the same draft manage to topple the 1,000-yard mark.But that's exactly what happened; Watkins flirted with 1,000 yards as well.We probably should have seen a regre sion coming, though. That year was not some launching pad for incredible early wide receiver production. History tells us that first-round wide receivers, some of them later becoming dominant, did not have huge succe s out of the gate.Receiver (Team)Pick (Year)Rookie receptionsRookie receiving yardsRookie receiving TDs (DEN)22 (2010)222832 (DAL)24 (2010)455619 (OAK)7 (2009)91241 (SF)10 (2009)486252 (PHI)19 (2009)567734 (MIN)22 (2009)607906 (NYG)29 (2009)477906 (TEN)30 (2009)427013There was not a single first-round wide receiver drafted in 2008, which is an anomaly. The year before was interesting too, because it featured six of them drafted, with checking in as the headliner at No. 2 overall. Johnson is, in my opinion, a Hall of Fame player, but even Megatron wasn't immune to the struggles of a first-year wideout; he caught 48 pa ses for 756 yards and four touchdowns.Of the other first-round members of that draft cla s -- , , , and -- only one got remotely close to 1,000 yards. That would be Bowe, who went for 995 in his rookie year with the .A more likely result for these players was a breakout season in either Year 2 Jacob Josefson Women Jersey or Year 3 -- even Heyward-Bey, long considered one of the most picks of all time and a pretty large bust for Oakland where he was selected, managed to flirt with the century mark in his third season, posting a 64-catch season for 975 yards. So, basically, the reality of young wide receivers in the NFL never changed. It was skewed by the 2014 draft cla s and has been exacerbated by the performance of wideouts in the past three draft cla ses. Those cla ses have, admittedly, not looked great out of the gate in terms of performance. Last year, which featured three top-10 wide receivers combining for 470 receiving yards in their first year, really caused us to laser in on questions about the production of young wide receivers.The busts in the past three years have been REALLY busty. didn't record a catch as a rookie. is on a milk carton. Breshard Perriman was actually one of the better performers as a rookie, which says a lot. Comparing the 2015-17 cla ses against the 2011-13 cla ses isn't really a comparison.Draft yearsNumber of first-round receiversAverage receiving yards per season2011-201310601.2 yards2015- Gilbert Perreault Men Jersey 201713320.8 yardsThat's basically half the production with more receivers involved. But here's an economic theory to consider: After the boom of 2014, and with the increased emphasis on the pa sing game, was it po sible/likely teams were investing more and more draft capital into wide receivers? You better believe it.Draft YearsNumber of first-round receiversAverage draft position2011-20131016.82015-20171315.5Consider that not only were more wide receivers drafted in the subsequent three years, but the average draft position moved up more than a full slot. We were getting top-10 picks before 2014. Green/Jones, (good rookie season!) and (sheesh) all went inside the top 10. Teams weren't scared to invest a high draft pick on a wide receiver.But from 2007 through 2013 there were eight wideouts taken in the top 15 of drafts. In the past three years alone there have been six. That's wild -- , Kevin White, , , and all were drafted inside the top 15 over the past three years. And this is not hindsight, but none of those guys meet the threshold for Jones/Green. Maybe Cooper, but there was a debate about him versus White and who would go first in that draft.The post-2014 cla ses have the same number of first-round receivers with 1,000 yards (one, Cooper) as the three years before 2014 (one, Green). And each has the same number from the draft cla ses as a whole: was a second-round pick who topped 1,000 yards, while Allen was the lone non-first-round pick from 2011 through 2013 to cro s the threshold.The biggest problem for the position right now is we didn't get the expected third-year breakouts we would have hoped from the 2015 cla s. was the only one to really step up his game in the third year. Cooper regre sed into a shell last season, although there is still elite talent there. White has yet to really appear; like, he could be a ghost for all we know. Perriman has created a gulf on the roster. looked like a po sible breakout this season but the quarterback problems didn't help him any. Philip Dorsett has already been traded.The jury can still be out on the 2016 and '17 cla ses: Judging these young receivers by their first year based on what happened in 2014 is a foolish endeavor. proved why during large points of 2017, when he looked like a potentially dominant Jake Mccabe Women Jersey receiver. had an incredible stretch when was healthy.There's still time for these guys to develop into quality NFL receivers. The key is understanding that 2014 was the exception, not the rule. Smart NFL teams will look to the 2018 NFL Draft, which does not feature a large group of elite wideouts, and hold off on investing if they need an immediate injection of talent.Teams that did that in 2017 ended up with players like , Deshaun Watson, and , all taken within five picks of Ro s by the Bengals at No. 9. Immediate impact wideouts do not come along that often in the draft. Everyone just got fooled by a rare group in the 2014 draft cla s.
https://rafaelmcqc07531.wikidirective.com/6162477/joe_flacco_passes_joe_montana_on_all_time_passing_yard_list_with_50_yard_touchdown_on_monday_night_football
Click here Click here Click here